Sunday 27 September 2026 · Edition of the day

Current editionPast editions →

The Skeptic's Daily

The day's biggest stories, taken apart. For each one: what is actually established, what is only asserted, the questions worth asking — and a plausibility score for the central claim, given everything currently known.

Stories
2
Average plausibility
80%
How to read the score
It rates how well the core claim is evidenced — not how important the story is, nor whether it is good or bad news.
01BusinessSouth America

Lula bans betting ahead of Brazil's presidential election

Two outlets report a ban, but their descriptions differ on its scope.

BBC describes Lula as banning online gambling ahead of the presidential election. The Guardian more specifically reports a signed order banning fixed-odds sports betting just over a week before the first round. Lula presented the measure as addressing gambling-related harm.

What holds up

  • ✓Both outlets report that Lula has imposed a gambling-related ban.
  • ✓Both place the decision shortly before the presidential election.

What doesn't yet

  • ?BBC's broad description of online gambling differs from the Guardian's narrower description of fixed-odds sports betting.
  • ?The order's text, implementation arrangements and exemptions are absent.

Ask before you share

  • →Which gambling products does the order actually prohibit?
  • →When does the ban take effect, and how will it be enforced?

Sources & original reporting

  1. [1]BBC News · Published 26 Sept 2026 · bbc.co.uk
  2. [2]The Guardian · Published 26 Sept 2026 · theguardian.com
02BusinessMiddle East

UN adds 61 companies to settlements database

The UN human rights office alleges links to violations against Palestinians, while Israel rejects the publication.

The Guardian reports that the UN human rights office added 61 companies to a database of businesses it says are involved in violating Palestinian human rights through ties to Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank. The reported total is now 214 companies. Israel rejects the publication and says the businesses have committed no wrongdoing.

What holds up

  • ✓The item attributes the additions and allegations to the UN human rights office.
  • ✓It includes Israel's explicit rejection of the publication.

What doesn't yet

  • ?The underlying allegations are disputed by Israel and cannot be adjudicated from the excerpt.
  • ?The database, company-specific evidence and business responses are not supplied.

Ask before you share

  • →What criteria and evidence support each company's inclusion?
  • →Have the named companies responded or challenged their listings?

Sources & original reporting

  1. [1]The Guardian · Published 26 Sept 2026 · theguardian.com