Friday 2 October 2026 · Edition of the day

Current editionPast editions →

The Skeptic's Daily

The day's biggest stories, taken apart. For each one: what is actually established, what is only asserted, the questions worth asking — and a plausibility score for the central claim, given everything currently known.

Stories
1
Average plausibility
62%
How to read the score
It rates how well the core claim is evidenced — not how important the story is, nor whether it is good or bad news.
01ScienceAsia-Pacific

Australian researchers report two contributors to recurrent bacterial vaginosis

The findings concern why some infections are harder to cure, but the supplied extract omits the study details.

The Guardian reports that Australian scientists have identified two contributors to recurrent bacterial vaginosis infections. The Melbourne researchers previously worked on BV transmission and have turned to understanding why some cases are harder to cure. The item describes BV as affecting about one in four women globally.

What holds up

  • ✓The Guardian explicitly reports the identification of two contributors to recurrent BV.
  • ✓The supplied extract identifies the researchers as Melbourne-based and describes their earlier work on transmission.

What doesn't yet

  • ?The extract does not name the two contributors or provide the study's methods, sample size or publication details.
  • ?The global prevalence estimate is not accompanied by its source, and no treatment benefit is demonstrated in the supplied material.

Ask before you share

  • →What are the two contributors, and does the study establish causation or association?
  • →Have the findings been independently replicated or tested in treatment studies?

Sources & original reporting

  1. [1]The Guardian · Published 1 Oct 2026 · theguardian.com