Tuesday 13 October 2026 · Edition of the day

Current editionPast editions →

The Skeptic's Daily

The day's biggest stories, taken apart. For each one: what is actually established, what is only asserted, the questions worth asking — and a plausibility score for the central claim, given everything currently known.

Stories
2
Average plausibility
66%
How to read the score
It rates how well the core claim is evidenced — not how important the story is, nor whether it is good or bad news.
01HealthEurope

Cambridge study suggests gender gap in autoimmune diagnosis

Women were reportedly more likely to have symptoms labelled psychological, though the excerpt omits the study's methods.

The Guardian reports that a Cambridge University study suggests women with autoimmune conditions are up to 74% more likely than men to be told their symptoms are psychological or psychosomatic. It also reports longer waits for diagnosis and treatment among women. The supplied excerpt does not identify the study population or explain how the comparisons were calculated.

What holds up

  • ✓The Guardian attributes the findings to a Cambridge University study rather than presenting them as an unsupported general assertion.
  • ✓The report describes both psychological attribution of symptoms and delays in diagnosis and treatment.

What doesn't yet

  • ?Only one outlet is supplied, with no paper, sample size, study location or methodology available for assessment.
  • ?The phrase 'up to 74%' does not establish a uniform effect across conditions or populations, and no absolute rates are given.

Ask before you share

  • →Which conditions and populations were studied, and how representative were the participants?
  • →What were the absolute rates, uncertainty ranges and adjustments for other differences between patients?

Sources & original reporting

  1. [1]The Guardian · Published 13 Oct 2026 · theguardian.com
02HealthAfrica

Monitor warns that conflict and drought are increasing Sudan's famine risk

Al Jazeera reports drought affecting roughly half the country, but the extract provides no assessment methodology.

Al Jazeera reports a monitor's warning that conflict and drought are increasing the risk of famine in Sudan. Its summary says El Niño-induced drought is affecting roughly half the country as a three-year war continues.

What holds up

  • ✓The item reports a warning about famine risk, not a declaration that famine exists throughout Sudan.
  • ✓The report identifies both conflict and drought as contributing factors.

What doesn't yet

  • ?The monitor is not named in the supplied extract, and its evidence and methodology are absent.
  • ?The description 'roughly half of the country' does not specify whether it refers to land area, population or another measure.

Ask before you share

  • →Which monitor issued the warning, and what data underpin it?
  • →Which areas and populations face the greatest risk, and over what period?

Sources & original reporting

  1. [1]Al Jazeera · Published 12 Oct 2026 · aljazeera.com