Friday 16 October 2026 · Edition of the day

Current editionPast editions →

The Skeptic's Daily

The day's biggest stories, taken apart. For each one: what is actually established, what is only asserted, the questions worth asking — and a plausibility score for the central claim, given everything currently known.

Stories
2
Average plausibility
79%
How to read the score
It rates how well the core claim is evidenced — not how important the story is, nor whether it is good or bad news.
RegionAllGlobalAfricaNorth AmericaSouth AmericaAsia-PacificEuropeMiddle East
TopicAllPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusinessScienceHealth
01BusinessGlobal

Technology sell-off deepens amid inflation and AI debt concerns

Guardian and France 24 reports describe falling technology shares, with limited supporting market data in the supplied extracts.

The Guardian reports a deepening technology market sell-off amid concerns about US inflation, AI debt and possible interest-rate rises. It names Samsung and SoftBank among companies whose shares plunged. France 24 separately reports that AI stocks lost a trillion dollars during the week's sell-off.

What holds up

  • ✓Two outlets report a technology or AI stock sell-off.
  • ✓The Guardian identifies Samsung and SoftBank, grounding the report in named companies rather than an unspecified market decline.

What doesn't yet

  • ?The trillion-dollar figure appears only in France 24's extract, without a defined basket of stocks or calculation.
  • ?The suggested causes are market interpretations; the extracts do not establish their relative contribution to selling.

Ask before you share

  • →Which stocks and dates underpin the reported trillion-dollar loss?
  • →How broad was the decline beyond the named technology companies?

Sources & original reporting

  1. [1]The Guardian · Published 15 Oct 2026 · theguardian.com
  2. [2]France 24 · Published 15 Oct 2026 · france24.com
02ScienceGlobal

International timekeepers vote to replace leap second with leap hour

The Guardian reports an agreement on timekeeping, with the first leap hour not expected for thousands of years.

The Guardian reports that international timekeeping delegates voted to replace the leap second with a leap hour. Its summary says delegates agreed the leap second was no longer tenable. It also says the first leap hour is unlikely to occur for thousands of years.

What holds up

  • ✓The Guardian explicitly reports a vote by international timekeepers, rather than merely a scientific suggestion.
  • ✓The extract distinguishes adoption of the approach from the distant prospect of applying a leap hour.

What doesn't yet

  • ?Only one outlet covers the decision in the supplied material, with no resolution or official record attached.
  • ?The extract does not provide implementation rules, transition dates or the calculations behind the projected timescale.

Ask before you share

  • →What does the adopted resolution specify about implementation?
  • →What assumptions underpin the estimate that a leap hour is thousands of years away?

Sources & original reporting

  1. [1]The Guardian · Published 15 Oct 2026 · theguardian.com