Tuesday 27 October 2026 · Edition of the day

Current editionPast editions →

The Skeptic's Daily

The day's biggest stories, taken apart. For each one: what is actually established, what is only asserted, the questions worth asking — and a plausibility score for the central claim, given everything currently known.

Stories
3
Average plausibility
94%
How to read the score
It rates how well the core claim is evidenced — not how important the story is, nor whether it is good or bad news.
RegionAllGlobalAfricaNorth AmericaSouth AmericaAsia-PacificEuropeMiddle East
TopicAllPoliticsConflict & SecurityBusinessScienceHealth
01PoliticsNorth America

Comey faces another federal prosecution over alleged classified leak

Court filings support reports of a new prosecution attempt, but its legal standing and the underlying leak allegation remain disputed.

The Justice Department is seeking to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey for a third time, accusing him of arranging the disclosure of national defense information in 2016. AP reports that prosecutors filed a charging document called a criminal information to extend the deadline for bringing charges, while Comey's lawyers say the effort is legally invalid and too late. BBC reports that his lawyers link the allegation to a New York Times disclosure in 2016, and Al Jazeera reports that Comey denies wrongdoing.

What holds up

  • ✓AP, Reuters, Politico and CBS describe a new prosecution attempt based on court filings. Their reporting strongly supports the existence of the filing, but several accounts describing the same court papers do not provide separate proof that Comey leaked information.
  • ✓Politico and Reuters report two charges involving the transmission of national defense information. CBS confirms that prosecutors used a criminal information rather than a grand jury indictment or criminal complaint.

What doesn't yet

  • ?The filing's legal effect remains unresolved in these excerpts. AP reports that prosecutors say it extends the charging deadline; Comey's lawyers reject that position. CNN also reports that the Justice Department describes the document as not enforceable, making headlines that simply say Comey was charged less informative than accounts describing a prosecution attempt.
  • ?The leak remains an allegation, and Comey denies wrongdoing. The supplied excerpts do not establish what evidence proves he directed an unlawful disclosure or provide a court ruling on the merits.
  • ?The source list overstates the number of separate reporting efforts: the Sacramento Bee and News Tribune carry the same Reuters report, and NPR's excerpt closely matches AP's wording. The excerpts and snippets are not full-article verification.

Ask before you share

  • →Has a court ruled that this filing preserves the charging deadline, and what must prosecutors do next before the case can proceed?
  • →What evidence beyond prosecutors' allegations connects Comey to an unlawful disclosure, and how does his defense answer it?

Sources & original reporting

  1. [1]BBC News · Published 27 Oct 2026 · bbc.co.uk
  2. [2]Associated Press · Published 27 Oct 2026 · apnews.com
  3. [3]Al Jazeera · Published 27 Oct 2026 · aljazeera.com
  4. [4]NPR · Published 27 Oct 2026 · npr.org
  5. [5]Politico · Published 26 Oct 2026 · politico.com
  6. [6]CNN · Published 26 Oct 2026 · cnn.com
  7. [7]CBS News · Published 26 Oct 2026 · cbsnews.com
  8. [8]Sacbee · Published 26 Oct 2026 · sacbee.com
  9. [9]Thenewstribune · Published 26 Oct 2026 · thenewstribune.com
02PoliticsNorth America

Judge rules Maurene Comey's firing unlawful

Several newsrooms report the ruling, but it does not by itself establish Comey’s claim that she was fired because of her father.

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman ruled on October 26 that the Trump administration unlawfully fired Manhattan federal prosecutor Maurene Comey, Reuters, NPR and other outlets report. Comey, who served as a prosecutor for about a decade, challenged her July 2025 dismissal. She alleged that the administration fired her because of her father, former FBI Director James Comey; the supplied excerpts describe a ruling about legal limits on dismissal, not a finding that proves that motive.

What holds up

  • ✓Reuters, NPR, CNBC and other newsrooms agree that Furman found the dismissal unlawful. They describe limits Congress placed on the administration’s power to fire prosecutors, rather than simply a disagreement over personnel policy.
  • ✓The Associated Press report carried by The Boston Globe says Comey served as an assistant U.S. attorney for a decade. CNBC reports that Furman awarded retroactive reinstatement and back pay for July 16 through December 20, 2025.
  • ✓The coverage is broad, but much of it describes the same court ruling. Repeated NPR and CNBC excerpts are duplicates, not extra confirmation; the excerpts also do not substitute for checking the full opinion and articles.

What doesn't yet

  • ?Comey’s claim that her father’s conflict with Trump prompted her firing remains an allegation in the supplied material. Reuters and NPR attribute that explanation to her lawsuit, not to a finding by the judge.
  • ?The Justice Department argued that it had constitutional authority to fire her despite congressional limits, according to Reuters. Furman rejected that position; the excerpts do not establish whether an appeal has been filed or resolved.
  • ?Reports emphasizing reinstatement can suggest a current return to work. CNBC specifies a retroactive award ending December 20, 2025, when Furman inferred she had accepted another job; that does not establish that she is returning to the prosecutor’s office now.

Ask before you share

  • →Did the judge decide why Comey was fired, or only that the administration lacked lawful grounds and procedures to dismiss her?
  • →Does the full order require a present-day return to work, or only retroactive reinstatement and compensation for a defined period?
  • →Has a later appeal or stay changed the ruling’s effect?

Sources & original reporting

  1. [1]NPR · Published 26 Oct 2026 · npr.org
  2. [2]CNBC · Published 26 Oct 2026 · cnbc.com
  3. [3]Bostonglobe · Published 26 Oct 2026 · bostonglobe.com
  4. [4]Reuters · Published 26 Oct 2026 · reuters.com
03PoliticsNorth America

Appeals court blocks federal effort to halt counting of some California ballots

The Ninth Circuit turned away the Justice Department’s emergency request on procedural grounds, without settling its allegations about voters’ citizenship.

The Ninth Circuit rejected the Trump administration’s emergency effort to stop California from counting mail ballots linked to a list of roughly 20,000 voters whose citizenship federal officials questioned. The Los Angeles Times, CNN and AP report that the October 26 decision was 2-1 and rested on the lower court not yet having had an adequate chance to rule. AP reported that a district court hearing was scheduled for October 27; the supplied excerpts do not establish its outcome.

What holds up

  • ✓The central event holds up: the Los Angeles Times, CNN, AP and Reuters all report that the appeals court rejected the emergency request. These provide broader support than Al Jazeera’s brief account alone.
  • ✓The court’s reason matters: it said it lacked authority to hear the appeal at that stage because the district court had not yet addressed the request. This was an immediate setback for the government, not a final decision on whether the disputed ballots could be counted.

What doesn't yet

  • ?The claim that the voters are noncitizens comes from the Justice Department. The supplied excerpts do not establish how officials assembled the list, whether it contains errors, or whether anyone on it voted unlawfully.
  • ?Reports describe roughly 20,000 “ballots,” while Reuters more precisely describes a list of more than 20,000 registered voters. The excerpts do not resolve how many listed voters actually returned ballots.
  • ?Several websites carry the same AP account, and NBC News’s excerpt closely matches the Reuters report carried by the Sacramento Bee; those repetitions are not separate confirmations. This assessment uses excerpts, not full articles or a direct review of the court order.

Ask before you share

  • →What records support the Justice Department’s citizenship allegations, and how were possible errors checked?
  • →How many people on the federal list actually returned ballots, and how many have had their citizenship verified?
  • →What happened at the scheduled October 27 district court hearing, and did any later order change the counting rules?

Sources & original reporting

  1. [1]Al Jazeera · Published 27 Oct 2026 · aljazeera.com
  2. [2]Cdapress · Published 26 Oct 2026 · cdapress.com
  3. [3]NBC News · Published 26 Oct 2026 · nbcnews.com
  4. [4]Latimes · Published 27 Oct 2026 · latimes.com
  5. [5]CNN · Published 26 Oct 2026 · cnn.com
  6. [6]Sacbee · Published 26 Oct 2026 · sacbee.com